Manifesto

Authentication is not a choice between human expertise and technology. It is both of them, together.

Authenticity has always mattered in the art world. But the stakes have changed.

As values rise and sales break records, the pressure to be certain has grown beyond what traditional methods alone can absorb. Experts disagree. Cases stay unresolved. The evidence exists, but it has become too vast and complex for any one expert to evaluate consistently.

AI doesn’t replace that expertise. It depends on it. Without the scholarship, the authenticated works, and carefully curated reference material, there is nothing to train on.

But with it, AI can do what the human eye cannot: compare a work against thousands of references at once, find patterns across an entire body of work, and return a result that is documented, reproducible, and explicit about its limits.

At Art Recognition, we believe the future of authentication is not a choice between human judgment and technology. It is both, working together.

The reason we started

Three rigorous methods have always carried authentication: connoisseurship, provenance, forensic analysis. Each leaves gaps the others cannot fill. We started Art Recognition because one missing layer, the systematic visual analysis of an artist’s work at scale, could close some of those gaps. We built it as an independent, documented contribution. Not a replacement for established methods but a fourth layer alongside them.

Meet the team

At Art Recognition, every analysis is a collaboration between people and AI. We are a multidisciplinary team with expertise spanning art history, AI engineering, client relationships and communications, operations, and more.

Advisors

Our advisory board brings together expertise in art history, technology, and business. Their role is to help ensure that our technology is academically rigorous, technologically sound, and relevant to the decisions faced by collectors, institutions, and art market professionals.